$user = $this->Session->read('Auth.User');
//find the group of logged user
$groupId = $user['Group']['id'];
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Articles/view.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
$image = 'https://old.newbusinessage.com/app/webroot/img/news/'
$user = null
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 115
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
Notice (8): Trying to access array offset on value of type null [APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 115]
$user = $this->Session->read('Auth.User');
//find the group of logged user
$groupId = $user['Group']['id'];
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Articles/view.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
$image = 'https://old.newbusinessage.com/app/webroot/img/news/'
$user = null
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 115
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
Notice (8): Trying to access array offset on value of type null [APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 116]
//find the group of logged user
$groupId = $user['Group']['id'];
$user_id=$user["id"];
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Articles/view.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
$image = 'https://old.newbusinessage.com/app/webroot/img/news/'
$user = null
$groupId = null
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 116
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.
Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.
On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.
However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.
Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.
The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused.
FormHelper::create() - CORE/Cake/View/Helper/FormHelper.php, line 383
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 273
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
include - APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 60
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::_renderElement() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 1224
View::element() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 418
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 391
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
Warning (2): simplexml_load_file() [<a href='http://php.net/function.simplexml-load-file'>function.simplexml-load-file</a>]: I/O warning : failed to load external entity "" [APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 60]
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
simplexml_load_file - [internal], line ??
include - APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 60
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::_renderElement() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 1224
View::element() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 418
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 391
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
file not found!
Notice (8): Undefined variable: file [APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 133]
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
$xml = false
include - APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 133
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::_renderElement() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 1224
View::element() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 418
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 391
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
Warning (2): simplexml_load_file() [<a href='http://php.net/function.simplexml-load-file'>function.simplexml-load-file</a>]: I/O warning : failed to load external entity "" [APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 133]
$viewFile = '/var/www/html/newbusinessage.com/app/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
'article' => array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
[maximum depth reached]
)
),
'Slider' => array()
),
'current_user' => null,
'logged_in' => false
)
$article = array(
'Article' => array(
'id' => '6691',
'article_category_id' => '1',
'title' => 'Money Which Lacks Source is Laundered Money: SC',
'sub_title' => '',
'summary' => 'October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. ',
'content' => '<p>October 11: The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that the money for which source cannot be disclosed would be considered as laundered money. The verdict was issued by the full bench of the apex court about a year ago but the full text was published in Nepal’s law journal on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Earlier, a joint bench of SC justices had issued a verdict that only the monies proven to have been earned through illegal means would be considered money laundering. However, the full bench of justices overturned the verdict and ruled that any money lacking source of income would be considered money laundering.</p>
<p>On July 10, 2013, the joint bench of SC justices had set a precedent saying that the money held by Sunil Jaiswal and others cannot be considered money laundering unless it was proven that the money was earned through illegal means.</p>
<p>However, the full bench of justices Jagdish Sharma Poudel, Meera Khadka and Dr Anand Mohan Bhattarai overturned the precedent and ruled that the money held Madhav Kumar Bhagat and Ashok Kumar Kar accounted to money laundering as they were unable to show the source of income.</p>
<p>Section 28 of the Money Laundering Act, 2064 states that the accused must show the source of income if their property is not in proportion to their income or financial status, if they maintain a high standard of life and donates more than one’s capacity. If the accused fail to show the source of income then the money will be considered as money laundering.</p>
<p>The defendant Bhagat had claimed that the money he had belonged to Indian nationals but failed to establish his claims. Police had confiscated Rs 1.8 million from the accused. </p>
',
'published' => true,
'created' => '2017-10-11',
'modified' => '2017-10-11',
'keywords' => '',
'description' => '',
'sortorder' => '6474',
'image' => null,
'article_date' => '2017-10-11 00:00:00',
'homepage' => false,
'breaking_news' => false,
'main_news' => true,
'in_scroller' => false,
'user_id' => '16'
),
'ArticleCategory' => array(
'id' => '1',
'name' => 'NEWS',
'parentOf' => '0',
'published' => true,
'registered' => '2015-07-20 00:00:00',
'sortorder' => '158',
'del_flag' => '0',
'homepage' => true,
'display_in_menu' => true,
'user_id' => '1',
'created' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'modified' => '2018-11-22 11:58:49'
),
'User' => array(
'password' => '*****',
'id' => '16',
'user_detail_id' => '0',
'group_id' => '1',
'username' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'name' => '',
'email' => 'anmaharjan@newbusinessage.com',
'address' => '',
'gender' => '',
'access' => '1',
'phone' => '',
'access_type' => '0',
'activated' => false,
'sortorder' => '0',
'published' => '0',
'created' => '2016-04-04 17:02:17',
'last_login' => '2018-09-17 11:47:56',
'ip' => '202.63.242.112'
),
'ArticleComment' => array(),
'ArticleFeature' => array(),
'ArticleHasAuthor' => array(),
'ArticleHasTag' => array(),
'ArticleView' => array(
(int) 0 => array(
'article_id' => '6691',
'hit' => '931'
)
),
'Slider' => array()
)
$current_user = null
$logged_in = false
$xml = false
simplexml_load_file - [internal], line ??
include - APP/View/Elements/side_bar.ctp, line 133
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::_renderElement() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 1224
View::element() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 418
include - APP/View/Articles/view.ctp, line 391
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 968
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
